Elements of a Roth Conversion

Kelsey Arvai Contributed by: Kelsey Arvai, CFP®, MBA

Print Friendly and PDF

We’ve just entered Autumn, and the new year is around the corner, making this the ideal time to consider a Roth Individual retirement account (IRA) conversion to save on future taxes. A Roth Conversion is a financial maneuver that allows you to convert funds from a Traditional Individual Retirement Account (IRA) or pre-tax funds into a Roth IRA or future tax-free funds. There are several important considerations and potential tax implications.

Stated another way, a Roth Conversion involves taking some or all the funds from your Traditional IRA and moving them into a Roth IRA.

Tax Impact: Before doing a Roth Conversion, it’s crucial to understand the tax implications. The amount you convert will be added to your taxable income for the year the conversion occurs. In other words, you’ll need to pay income taxes on the converted amount in the year of the conversion. It’s important to consider what tax bracket you are in. You could pay a large upfront federal and state tax bill depending on the conversion size.

Additionally, when your adjusted gross income is boosted, you might pay higher Medicare Part B and Part D premiums or lose eligibility for other tax breaks, depending on your situation.

Future Tax Benefits: The primary benefit of a Roth Conversion is that once the money is in the Roth IRA, future qualified withdrawals (including earnings) are tax-free. Tax-free withdrawals are especially advantageous if you expect your tax rate in retirement to be higher. Typically, a partial or full Roth Conversion is more attractive in lower-earning years because there could be a smaller upfront tax liability. It may be beneficial for you to lock in lower rates now before they sunset in 2026 (the highest federal income tax bracket rate may move from 37% to 39.6% unless there are changes from Congress).

Timing: It’s important to consider your financial situation and whether you have the cash on hand to pay the taxes. If you choose to pay taxes from the converted fund, you may erode the long-term benefits of the conversion. A longer investing timeline is preferred because there’s more time for tax-free growth to offset the upfront cost of the conversion. Remember the five-year rule, which requires investors to wait five years before withdrawing converted balances without incurring a 10% penalty, with the timeline starting on January 1st of the year of the conversion. Without proper planning, you could deplete your savings or trigger an IRS penalty, so working with your Financial Advisor and Tax Advisor is essential. Contact us if you have questions or want to check if this strategy is a good fit!

Kelsey Arvai, CFP®, MBA is an Associate Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She facilitates back office functions for clients.

Opinions expressed in the attached article are those of Kelsey Arvai, MBA, CFP®, and are not necessarily those of Raymond James. Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. Member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services.

Another Way to Make Retirement Purposeful for You

Sandy Adams Contributed by: Sandra Adams, CFP®

Print Friendly and PDF

One of our Center values is Education and Personal Growth. Continuously learning and growing in our personal and professional lives is core to what we are and what we do. It is also something we incorporate into conversations with clients as they think about what might make their retirements meaningful to them. 

Beyond knowing that clients are financially prepared for their retirement, we want to help make the next stage of their lives as purposeful and satisfying as possible. Part of that is helping clients explore hobbies, volunteer activities, travel, and learning that will fulfill them and make their lives full.  

Locally, there are several universities that can help fulfill the need of those looking to continue to learn and grow personally in retirement. We have three universities in Michigan that have been named Age-Friendly Universities – Michigan State University, Eastern Michigan University, and Wayne State University. In particular, Wayne State University offers a 75% tuition reduction to students 60 or older and sponsors the Society of Active Retirees, a 1,200-member lifelong learning community. Its volunteer force includes 300 persons 50 and up, and more than half of its faculty and 40% of staff are 50 or older. The WSU Institute of Gerontology also has an extensive research portfolio on aging, having received $54 million in funding for aging issues since 2015.

If you are interested in learning more about Wayne State University’s Age-Friendly University benefits, click here. And if you are interested in learning more about the Society for Active Retirees, click hereIf you are interested in having a conversation about exploring other options for developing your own purposeful retirement, please reach out to one of our planners at The Center to start that conversation today.

Sandra Adams, CFP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and holds a CeFT™ designation. She specializes in Elder Care Financial Planning and serves as a trusted source for national publications, including The Wall Street Journal, Research Magazine, and Journal of Financial Planning.

Opinions expressed in the attached article are those of Sandra D. Adams, CFP® and are not necessarily those of Raymond James. Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. Member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services.

Can I Avoid IRMAA Surcharges on Medicare Part B and Part D?

Print Friendly and PDF

In 2023, Medicare Part B premiums for 95% of Americans will be $164.90/mo. However, the other 5% will have to face what’s known as the Income Related Monthly Adjustment Amount or IRMAA and pay higher Part B and D premiums. Each year, the chart below is updated, and in most cases, premiums increase gradually with inflation, as do the income parameters associated with each premium tier.

Source: Medicare.gov

Receiving communication that you’re subject to IRMAA and facing higher Medicare premiums is never a pleasant notification. With proper planning, however, there are strategies to potentially avoid IRMAA both now and in the future.

But first, let’s do a quick refresher on the basics

Medicare bases your premium on your latest tax return filed with the IRS. For example, when your 2023 Part B and D premiums were determined (likely occurred in October/November 2022), Medicare used your 2021 tax return to track income. If you are married and your Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) was over $194,000 in 2021 ($97,000 for single filers), you’re paying more for Part B and D premiums aka subject to IRMAA. Unlike how our tax brackets function, Medicare income thresholds are a true cliff. You could be $1 over the $194,000 threshold and that’s all it takes to increase your premiums for the year! As mentioned previously, your Part B and D premiums are based off of your Modified Adjusted Gross Income or MAGI. The calculation for MAGI is slightly different and unique from the typical Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) calculation as MAGI includes certain income “add back” items such as tax-free municipal bond interest. Simply put, while muni bond interest might function as tax-free income on your return, it does get factored into the equation when determining whether or not you’re subject to IRMAA.

Navigating IRMAA with Roth IRA conversion and portfolio income 

Given our historically low tax environment, Roth IRA conversions are as popular as ever. Current tax rates are set to expire in 2026, but this could occur sooner, depending on our political landscape. When a Roth conversion occurs, a client moves money from their Traditional IRA to a Roth IRA for future tax-free growth. When the funds are converted to the Roth, a taxable event occurs, and the funds converted are considered taxable in the year the conversion takes place. Because Roth IRA conversions add to your income for the year, it’s common for the conversion to be the root cause of an IRMAA if proper planning does not occur. What makes this even trickier is the two-year lookback period. So, for clients considering Roth conversions, the magic age to begin being cognizant of the Medicare income thresholds is not at age 65 when Medicare begins, but rather age 63 because it’s that year’s tax return that will ultimately determine your Medicare premiums at age 65! 

Now that there are no “do-overs” with Roth conversions (Roth conversion re-characterizations went away in 2018), our preference in most cases is to do Roth conversions in November or December for clients who are age 63 and older. By that time, we will have a clear picture of total income for the year. I can’t tell you how often we’ve seen situations where clients confidently believe their income will be a certain amount but ends up being much higher due to an unexpected income event.

Another way to navigate IRMAA is by being cognizant of income from after-tax investment/brokerage accounts. Things like capital gains, dividends, interest, etc., all factor into the MAGI calculation previously mentioned. Being intentional with the asset location of accounts can potentially help save thousands in Medicare premiums.

Ways to reduce income to potentially lower part B and D premiums

Qualified Charitable Distribution (QCD) 

  • If you’re over 70 ½ and subject to Required Minimum Distributions (RMD), gifting funds from your IRA directly to a charity prevents income from hitting your tax return. This reduction in income could help shield you from IRMAA. 

Contributing to a tax-deductible retirement account such as a 401k, 403b, IRA, SEP-IRA, etc.

  • Depositing funds into one of these retirement accounts reduces MAGI and could help prevent IRMAA.

Deferring income into another year 

  • Whether it means drawing income from an after-tax investment account for cash flow needs or holding off on selling a stock that would create a capital gain towards year-end, being strategic with the timing of income generation could prove to be wise when navigating IRMAA. 

Accelerating business expenses to reduce income 

  • Small business owners who could be facing higher Medicare premiums might consider accelerating expenses in certain years, which in turn drives taxable income lower if they’re flirting with IRMAA. 

Putting IRMAA into perspective 

Higher Medicare premiums are essentially a form of additional tax, which can help us put things into perspective. For example, if a couple decides to do aggressive Roth IRA conversions to maximize the 22% tax bracket and MAGI ends up being $200,000, their federal tax bill will be approximately $30,000. This translates into an effective/average tax rate of 15% ($30,000 / $200,000). However, if you factor in the IRMAA, it will end up being about $1,700 total for the couple between the higher Part B and D premiums. This additional "tax" ends up only pushing the effective tax rate to 15.85% - less than a 1% increase! I highlight this not to trivialize a $1,700 additional cost for the year, as this is real money we're talking about here. That said, I do feel it's appropriate to zoom out a bit and maintain perspective on the big picture. If we forgo savvy planning opportunities to save a bit on Medicare premiums, we could end up costing ourselves much more down the line. However, not taking IRMAA into consideration is also a miss in our opinion. Like anything in investment and financial planning, a balanced approach is prudent when navigating IRMAA – there is never a "one size fits all" solution. 

Fighting back on IRMAA

If you've received notification that your Medicare Part B and D premiums are increasing due to IRMAA, there could be ways to reverse the decision. The most common situation is when a recent retiree starts Medicare and, in the latest tax return on file with the IRS, shows a much higher income level. Retirement is one example of what Medicare would consider a "life-changing event," in which case form SSA-44 can be completed, submitted with supporting documentation, and could lead to lower premiums. Other "life-changing events" would include:

  • Marriage

  • Divorce

  • Death of a spouse 

  • Work stoppage

  • Work reduction

  • Loss of income producing property 

  • Loss of pension income 

  • Employer settlement payment 

Medicare would not consider higher income in one given year due to a Roth IRA conversion or realizing a large capital gain a life-changing event that would warrant a reduction in premium. This highlights the importance of planning accordingly with these items.

If you disagree with Medicare's decision in determining your premiums, you have the ability to have a right to appeal by filing a "request for reconsideration" using form SSA-561-U2.

Conclusion

As you can see, the topic of IRMAA is enough to make anyone's head spin. To learn more, visit the Social Security Administration's website dedicated to this topic. Prudent planning around your Medicare premiums is just one example of much of the work we do for clients that extends well beyond managing investments that we believe add real value over time. 

If you or someone you care about is struggling with how to put all of these pieces together to achieve a favorable outcome, we are here to help. Our team of CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professionals offers a complimentary "second opinion meeting" to address your most pressing financial questions and concerns. In many cases, by the end of this 30-45 minute discussion, it will make sense to continue the conversation of possibly working together. Other times, it will not, but our team can assure you that you will hang up the phone walking away with questions answered and a plan moving forward. We look forward to the conversation!

Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Nick specializes in tax-efficient retirement income and distribution planning for clients and serves as a trusted source for local and national media publications, including WXYZ, PBS, CNBC, MSN Money, Financial Planning Magazine and OnWallStreet.com.

Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. Raymond James and its advisors do not offer tax or legal advice. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional. Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Inc. owns the certification marks CFP®, CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™, CFP® (with plaque design) and CFP® (with flame design) I the U.S. which it awards to individuals who successfully complete CFP Board’s initial and ongoing certification requirements.

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James.

There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct.

The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete.

Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services are offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Center for Financial Planning, Inc. is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services.

Planning for Medicare

Print Friendly and PDF

Here it is again…time for changing leaves, cooler weather, and open enrollment for Medicare. Medicare coverage is an important decision, and we suggest reviewing your coverages on an annual basis.

Sign up today for our upcoming seminar on Monday, October 2nd hosted by Sandy Adams, CFP® of Center for Financial Planning, Inc., and presented by Cynthia Brown of Powers Financial Benefits, LLC, an independent agent, that provides details on Medicare, open enrollment, and what is important for 2023. And feel free to check out the replay from last year’s presentation below!

Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse Cynthia Brown or Powers Financial Benefits, LLC. Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® is an Independent Registered Investment Advisor. Investment advisory services are offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services. Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., Member FINRA/SIPC.

Secure Act 2.0 Roth Catch-up Change Delayed

Print Friendly and PDF

In late 2022, Secure Act 2.0 was passed by Congress with the intention of expanding access to retirement savings. The package requires retirement plans to implement many changes and updates based on the new rules. Of the nearly 100 provisions within Secure Act 2.0, only a few went into effect in 2023, and many changes were scheduled to become effective in 2024.

One of these provisions would require future retirement plan catch-up contributions (those ages 50 and over) to be categorized as Roth for participants who earned more than $145,000 in the prior year. Although more employer-sponsored retirement plans have included access to Roth savings over the years, not all plans offer that option to participants. With the new rule, they would either need to offer Roth savings to all employees or remove the option to make catch-up savings contributions for future years.

As the fall open enrollment period for 2024 is quickly approaching, many plan administrators and participants were waiting for guidance on implementing and monitoring this change for 2024. In late August, the IRS announced a two-year delay or “administrative transition period,” meaning that plans don’t need to implement this change until 2026.  

For those retirement plan participants who are 50 and older and contributing more than the base savings amount ($22,500 for 2023), pre-tax catch-up contributions can continue for 2024 and 2025 as they have in the past. For retirement plans that aren’t already offering a Roth savings option, they won’t need to make any changes yet!  

We are monitoring this and future changes as information and guidance are released on Secure Act 2.0 provisions. As always, we are here to help if you have questions on how this could affect you and your financial plan! 

Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CSRIC™ is a Financial Planning Manager and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She has more than a decade of financial planning and insurance industry experience.

The information contained in this letter does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CSRIC™, and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expression of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statement, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected, including diversification and asset allocation. Individual investor’s results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Rebalancing a non-retirement account could be a taxable event that may increase your tax liability.

The Dangers of Ignoring Financial Planning When You're in a Couple

Sandy Adams Contributed by: Sandra Adams, CFP®

Print Friendly and PDF

In an ideal world, a committed couple would be on the same page about most of the important things in life, especially about their financial future. Not only would they be on the same page, but they would equally participate in the planning process — all the way through the process. So, what happens when one partner is not engaged in the planning process — whether it be lack of interest in the process at all, or lack of engagement and/or follow-through once a plan has been completed? And what can be done, if anything, to make sure the couple and their plan are successful?

If both partners have been involved in going through at least an initial planning process, this is a good first step. This means that the couple has worked through the steps of establishing common goals, gathered their common financial information, and worked with a financial planner to review the analysis regarding how the assets and income they have may work to fulfill their specific goals, both now and in the future. These couples likely worked with the planner to establish at least an initial set of action steps to start working towards meeting their short- and long-term goals in the key areas of their financial plan.

Why One Partner May Be Unengaged:

Here is where there is usually a disconnect — where the less engaged spouse likely becomes unengaged. Once the initial financial plan is complete and the action steps are in place, the less engaged spouse may check out for various reasons:

  • They may decide they don’t see the full value of the financial plan;

  • They may get too busy with “life” and not make the financial plan a priority; or

  • They may not see themselves in the “financial” lead role in the relationship and be simply delegating the action items to their more financially savvy spouse (whether or not this makes sense remains to be seen.)

If one of the partners is not involved in the planning process at all, this can be an even harder situation to address. When one partner is not engaged in the process at all, it is hard to discuss, set, and include common goals in the planning process. If one partner goes ahead with a plan, it can be one-sided or incomplete if done without the unengaged partner. The plan will lack input from one partner and may, in fact, be missing important information about assets, employment benefits, and/or future income resources if the participating spouse isn’t privy to all of the couple’s collective financial resources. Not having a financial plan that both partners have participated in putting together will be one that is lacking in some way — whether it be a lack of information or resources or a lack of input or agreement on current or future goals.

Why You Should Move Ahead Anyway:

Why might someone decide to move ahead with the financial planning process even if their partner is hesitant to participate in the process? In my experience, there are clients who have wanted to do planning for years and haven’t been able to get their partner on board. They may finally decide that they need to move forward, with or without their partner, for fear that they will end up without a plan and completely unprepared for the future. In addition, they may have had an experience as a caregiver for an older adult parent or watched someone they are close to go through the process of becoming a widow or widower and decide they want to be prepared if either of these major life transitions ever happens to them. For these clients, the personal experience of seeing others go through major life transitions without proper planning may compel them to want to plan more urgently than their partner.

What are some actions that a couple can take if one is more engaged than the other in the financial planning process so that their plan can be successful?

  1. Come to a base agreement that a financial plan is needed. If you can come to a common agreement that a financial plan is needed, even if one of you is more enthusiastic about it than the other, that can be okay. If you can come to an agreement about who will take charge of scheduling a meeting with an advisor, collecting and organizing the information, scheduling appointments, etc., that is the first step. It is best if both partners will agree to participate in the full process, even if one takes the lead. This is the best way to ensure that you agree to and set common goals.

  2. Set a regular “date” with your partner to discuss and review your finances. This blocks out time on your common schedules to concentrate on just your plan when you are working on preparing for the initial financial plan, and then can be helpful when you are working on the action items following your plan. This helps with the issues related to partners who get busy with life and can’t seem to make finances a priority.

  3. Find a financial advisor that you feel you can trust and can delegate to. For those who have trouble with follow-through, or again, for those who have trouble carving out time, having a trusted professional to whom they can delegate to make sure that the plan gets carried out fully can be valuable and worth the cost.

As with many things in a relationship, partners aren’t always 100% on the same page or always rowing in the same direction all of the time. Finances are one of the most important issues a couple faces, and being in lock-step as much as possible is important. If a couple can find a way to work together in some way to complete and follow through on the financial planning process, even if one of the two takes the lead, but both participate, the process can still be a successful one.

Sandra Adams, CFP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and holds a CeFT™ designation. She specializes in Elder Care Financial Planning and serves as a trusted source for national publications, including The Wall Street Journal, Research Magazine, and Journal of Financial Planning.

The foregoing information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete. It is not a statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision, and it does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Sandra D. Adams and not necessarily those of Raymond James.

Prior to making an investment decision, please consult with your financial advisor about your individual situation.

Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. Member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc® Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services.

When to Use Your Emergency Fund

Sandy Adams Contributed by: Sandra Adams, CFP®

Print Friendly and PDF

Who actually has an emergency fund? “For those age 50 and up, it’s typically those who work with a financial advisor”, says Sandy Adams, CFP®. “The general population is bad at this. It’s particularly important to have an emergency fund as you get closer to retirement”, she says.

Read the full AARP article HERE!

Sandra Adams, CFP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and holds a CeFT™ designation. She specializes in Elder Care Financial Planning and serves as a trusted source for national publications, including The Wall Street Journal, Research Magazine, and Journal of Financial Planning.

Any opinions are those of Sandy Adams, CFP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services are offered through Raymond James Financial Services Advisors, Inc.

Raymond James is not affiliated with AARP.

The History of Labor Day

Kelsey Arvai Contributed by: Kelsey Arvai, CFP®, MBA

Print Friendly and PDF

We celebrate Labor Day to recognize the contribution and achievements of American workers. It unofficially marks the end of summer and is traditionally observed on the first Monday in September.

The history of Labor Day is somewhat grim. At the height of the Industrial Revolution, in the late 1800s, the average American worked 12-hour days and seven days a week to scrape together a decent living. To emphasize the dire working and living conditions, children as young as five or six worked in mills, factories, and mines across the country.

Most workers faced unsafe working conditions with insufficient access to fresh air, sanitary facilities, and break time. Because of this, labor unions first appeared in the late 18th century. Workers began organizing strikes and rallies to protest poor conditions and compel employers to renegotiate hours and pay. On September 5, 1882, 10,000 workers took unpaid time off to march from City Hall to Union Square in New York City, holding the first Labor Day parade in US history.

The “workingmen’s holiday” caught on in other industrial cities, and many states passed legislation recognizing it. Congress legalized the holiday 12 years after workers in Chicago went on strike to protest wage cuts and the firing of union representatives.

We can thank our labor leaders for the fact that we get to enjoy weekends off, a 40-hour work week, sick days, and paid time off. Thousands of Americans have marched, protested, and participated in strikes to create fairer, more equitable labor laws and workplaces – and still do today. So kick back, relax, and enjoy your long weekend!

Kelsey Arvai, CFP®, MBA is an Associate Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She facilitates back office functions for clients.

The foregoing information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete, it is not a statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision, and it does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Kelsey Arvai, MBA, CFP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James.

Impending Social Security Shortfall?

Josh Bitel Contributed by: Josh Bitel, CFP®

Print Friendly and PDF

About 1 in 4 married couples, and almost half of unmarried folks, rely on Social Security for a whopping 90% (!) of their retirement income needs. While the Social Security Administration recommends that no more than 40% of your retirement paycheck come from Social Security, the reality is that many Americans depend heavily on this benefit. The majority of Social Security funds come from existing workers paying their regular payroll taxes; however, when payroll is not enough to cover all claimants, we must then dip into the trust fund to make up the difference. According to the 2023 Social Security and Medicare Trustees Reports, the 'trust fund' that helps supply retirees with their monthly benefits is projected to run out of money by 2033. This estimate has many folks understandably worried, but experts have proposed several potential solutions that could help boost solvency.

One popular solution is to raise the age at which retirees are permitted to file for benefits. Currently, a claimant's full retirement age (the age at which you receive 100% of the benefits shown on a statement) is between 66 and 67. Studies published by the Congressional Budget Office show that raising by just two months per year for workers born between 1962 and 1978 (maxing out at age 70) could save billions of dollars annually in Social Security payments, thus helping cushion the trust fund by a substantial amount.

Another hotly debated solution is reducing annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) for claimants. As it currently stands, your Social Security benefit gets a bump each year to keep up with inflation (the most recent adjustment was 8.7% for 2023). This number is based on the consumer price index report and is a tool used to help retirees retain their purchasing power. Recent studies from the SSA show that if we reduced COLA by 0.5%, we could eliminate 40% of the impending shortfall. This goes up to 78% if we assume a 1.0% reduction in COLA. Neither of these solutions completely solves the shortfall, but a combination of COLA reductions and changes to FRA, as shown above, would go a long way toward solving this issue.

These are just a few of the several solutions debated by experts each year. It is important to note that even if no changes are made, current beneficiaries will continue to receive their payments. However, estimates show that if the trust fund ran completely dry, payments may be reduced by as much as 25%. While this is not an insignificant haircut, it is certainly better than cutting payments altogether.

The point is that Social Security is a crucial part of many retirees' livelihoods. It would be safe to assume that Congress would act and make changes before any major benefit cuts are required. These are several options to consider that would have varying impacts on not only solvency but also benefits themselves. If you are concerned about the role of Social Security in your personal retirement plan, discuss with your advisor how these changes may impact you.

Josh Bitel, CFP® is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® He conducts financial planning analysis for clients and has a special interest in retirement income analysis.

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Josh Bitel, CFP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James.

There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct.

The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete.

Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services are offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Center for Financial Planning, Inc. is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services.

Family Experiences Can Trigger Planning for Long Term Caregivers

Sandy Adams Contributed by: Sandra Adams, CFP®

Print Friendly and PDF

My grandmother died recently. She was 96 (almost 97) years old. The leading cause of death listed on her death certificate was Alzheimer’s disease. The last years of her life were not what I would call the best of “quality” – she had not been able to get out of bed to walk for several years, and while she did recognize her children until the end of her life, she would forget they had been there to see her within minutes. She outlived all of her siblings and most of my grandfather’s siblings (and my grandfather by almost three decades) and had been saying she was “ready to go” for quite some time.

Most of us familiar with Alzheimer’s and related dementias know that there are many types, and it is often hard to diagnose, especially if there are other health concerns. For many, it is more a result of older age than genetics; for those where early onset can be an issue, the symptoms can be masked by stress or other mental health issues, and the dementia can go untreated for years. Alzheimer’s and dementia causes and treatments are making some real progress but remain more of a mystery than they should for the more than 5.5 million Americans living with the disease.

While we are still being told that only a small fraction of those developing the disease are those that are not inherited (1 in 100 according to the Alzheimer’s Association), witnessing my grandmother spend her last several years in a nursing home floor of a hospital prompted me to make sure I had my Long Term Care plans covered.

When my grandparents were my age, Long Term Care insurance was unavailable. And because of that, my grandmother ended up spending down the assets my grandfather worked so hard for during his working life and living out her last years in a hospital nursing home on the memory care floor. She was fortunate to have ended up where she did — she was so well taken care of in a small town hospital. Some people don’t have it so well.

I want to make sure to have more control if this happens to me — and want to make sure that I can afford for care to be provided for me (rather than to have my kids have to do it), so I recently took steps to make sure I have a long term care policy in place that suits my needs. I am taking care of this now to have a plan in place for later.

As I tell clients all of the time, many of us don’t feel it is important to take action until we have had a personal experience with something. For me, watching my grandmother experience Alzheimer’s and Alzheimer’s care for the last several years has prompted me to put a Long Term Care plan into place for myself. If you have had a personal experience prompting you into action and would like our help, please do not hesitate to reach out — we are always happy to help!

Sandra Adams, CFP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and holds a CeFT™ designation. She specializes in Elder Care Financial Planning and serves as a trusted source for national publications, including The Wall Street Journal, Research Magazine, and Journal of Financial Planning.

Any opinions are those of Sandra D. Adams, CFP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James.

Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services are offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Center for Financial Planning, Inc. is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services. As with most financial decisions, there are expenses associated with the purchase of Long Term Care insurance and policies are subject to exclusions and limitations. Guarantees are based on the claims paying ability of the insurance company.