Does the 4% Rule Still Make Sense?

Contributed by: Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP®

'4% rule' history

In 1994, financial advisor and academic William Bengen published one of the most popular and widely cited research papers titled: 'Determining Withdrawal Rates Using Historical Data' published in the Journal of Financial Planning. Through extensive research, Bengen found that retirees could safely spend about 4% of their retirement savings in the first year of retirement. In future years, they could adjust those distributions with inflation and maintain a high probability of never running out of money, assuming a 30-year retirement time frame. In his study, the assumed portfolio composition for a retiree was a conservative 50% stock (S&P 500) and 50% in bonds (intermediate term Treasuries).

Is the 4% rule still relevant today? 

Over the past several years, more and more consumer and industry publications have written articles stating 'the 4% rule could be dead' and that a lower distribution rate closer to 3% is now appropriate. In 2021, Morningstar published a research paper calling the 4% rule no longer feasible and proposing a 3.3% withdrawal rate. Just over 12 months later, the same researchers updated the study and withdrawal rate to 3.8%!

When I read these articles and studies, I was surprised that none of them referenced what I consider critically important statistics from Bengen's 4% rule that should highlight how conservative it truly is:

• 96% of the time, clients who took out 4% of their portfolio each year (adjusted annually by inflation) over 30 years passed away with a portfolio balance that exceeded the value of their portfolio in the first year of retirement.

• Ex. A couple with a $1,000,000 portfolio who adhered to the 4% rule over 30 years had a 96% chance of passing away with a portfolio value of over $1,000,000!

• A client had a 50% chance of passing away with a portfolio value 1.6X the value of their portfolio in the first year of retirement.

• Ex. A couple with a $1,000,000 portfolio who adhered to the 4% rule over 30 years (adjusted annually by inflation) had a 50% chance of passing away with a portfolio value of over $1,600,000!

We must remember that the 4% rule was developed by looking at the worst possible time frame for someone to retire (October of 1968 – a perfect storm for a terrible stock market and high inflation). As more articles and studies questioned if the 4% rule was still relevant today, considering current equity valuations, bond yields, and inflation, William Bengen was compelled to address this. Through additional diversification, Bengen now believes the appropriate withdrawal rate is actually between 4.5% - 4.7% – nearly 15% higher than his original rule of thumb!

Applying the 4% rule 

My continued takeaway with the 4% rule is that it is a great starting place when guiding clients through an appropriate retirement income strategy. Factors such as health status, life expectancy, evolving spending goals in retirement, etc., all play a vital role in how much an individual or family can draw from their portfolio now and in the future. As I always say – there are no black and white answers in financial planning; your story is unique, and so is your financial plan! In my next blog, I'll touch on other considerations I believe are important to your portfolio withdrawal strategy – stay tuned!

Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Nick specializes in tax-efficient retirement income and distribution planning for clients and serves as a trusted source for local and national media publications, including WXYZ, PBS, CNBC, MSN Money, Financial Planning Magazine and OnWallStreet.com.

Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Center for Financial Planning, Inc is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services Investment advisory services are offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc.

The foregoing information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete, it is not a statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision, and it does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James. While we are familiar with the tax provisions of the issues presented herein, as Financial Advisors of RJFS, we are not qualified to render advice on tax or legal matters. You should discuss tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.

One cannot invest directly in an index. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Sources:

• https://www.financialplanningassociation.org/article/journal/MAR04-determining-withdrawal-rates-using-historical-data

• https://www.morningstar.com/lp/the-state-of-retirement-income

• https://finance.yahoo.com/news/even-inventor-bill-bengen-revisiting-143000007.html

Secure Act 2.0 Roth Catch-up Change Delayed

Contributed by: Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CSRIC™

In late 2022, Secure Act 2.0 was passed by Congress with the intention of expanding access to retirement savings. The package requires retirement plans to implement many changes and updates based on the new rules. Of the nearly 100 provisions within Secure Act 2.0, only a few went into effect in 2023, and many changes were scheduled to become effective in 2024.

One of these provisions would require future retirement plan catch-up contributions (those ages 50 and over) to be categorized as Roth for participants who earned more than $145,000 in the prior year. Although more employer-sponsored retirement plans have included access to Roth savings over the years, not all plans offer that option to participants. With the new rule, they would either need to offer Roth savings to all employees or remove the option to make catch-up savings contributions for future years.

As the fall open enrollment period for 2024 is quickly approaching, many plan administrators and participants were waiting for guidance on implementing and monitoring this change for 2024. In late August, the IRS announced a two-year delay or “administrative transition period,” meaning that plans don’t need to implement this change until 2026.  

For those retirement plan participants who are 50 and older and contributing more than the base savings amount ($22,500 for 2023), pre-tax catch-up contributions can continue for 2024 and 2025 as they have in the past. For retirement plans that aren’t already offering a Roth savings option, they won’t need to make any changes yet!  

We are monitoring this and future changes as information and guidance are released on Secure Act 2.0 provisions. As always, we are here to help if you have questions on how this could affect you and your financial plan! 

Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CSRIC™ is a Financial Planning Manager and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She has more than a decade of financial planning and insurance industry experience.

The information contained in this letter does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CSRIC™, and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expression of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statement, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected, including diversification and asset allocation. Individual investor’s results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Rebalancing a non-retirement account could be a taxable event that may increase your tax liability.

Impending Social Security Shortfall?

Contributed by: Josh Bitel, CFP®

About 1 in 4 married couples, and almost half of unmarried folks, rely on Social Security for a whopping 90% (!) of their retirement income needs. While the Social Security Administration recommends that no more than 40% of your retirement paycheck come from Social Security, the reality is that many Americans depend heavily on this benefit. The majority of Social Security funds come from existing workers paying their regular payroll taxes; however, when payroll is not enough to cover all claimants, we must then dip into the trust fund to make up the difference. According to the 2023 Social Security and Medicare Trustees Reports, the 'trust fund' that helps supply retirees with their monthly benefits is projected to run out of money by 2033. This estimate has many folks understandably worried, but experts have proposed several potential solutions that could help boost solvency.

One popular solution is to raise the age at which retirees are permitted to file for benefits. Currently, a claimant's full retirement age (the age at which you receive 100% of the benefits shown on a statement) is between 66 and 67. Studies published by the Congressional Budget Office show that raising by just two months per year for workers born between 1962 and 1978 (maxing out at age 70) could save billions of dollars annually in Social Security payments, thus helping cushion the trust fund by a substantial amount.

Another hotly debated solution is reducing annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) for claimants. As it currently stands, your Social Security benefit gets a bump each year to keep up with inflation (the most recent adjustment was 8.7% for 2023). This number is based on the consumer price index report and is a tool used to help retirees retain their purchasing power. Recent studies from the SSA show that if we reduced COLA by 0.5%, we could eliminate 40% of the impending shortfall. This goes up to 78% if we assume a 1.0% reduction in COLA. Neither of these solutions completely solves the shortfall, but a combination of COLA reductions and changes to FRA, as shown above, would go a long way toward solving this issue.

These are just a few of the several solutions debated by experts each year. It is important to note that even if no changes are made, current beneficiaries will continue to receive their payments. However, estimates show that if the trust fund ran completely dry, payments may be reduced by as much as 25%. While this is not an insignificant haircut, it is certainly better than cutting payments altogether.

The point is that Social Security is a crucial part of many retirees' livelihoods. It would be safe to assume that Congress would act and make changes before any major benefit cuts are required. These are several options to consider that would have varying impacts on not only solvency but also benefits themselves. If you are concerned about the role of Social Security in your personal retirement plan, discuss with your advisor how these changes may impact you.

Josh Bitel, CFP® is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® He conducts financial planning analysis for clients and has a special interest in retirement income analysis.

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Josh Bitel, CFP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James.

There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct.

The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete.

Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services are offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Center for Financial Planning, Inc. is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services.

Most Americans Want To ‘Age in Place’ At Home. Here’s How to Plan Your Support Systems

“None of us knows when that event might happen that will cause us to suddenly need help.” - Sandy Adams, CFP®

Read the full CNBC article HERE!

Any opinions are those of Sandy Adams, CFP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services are offered through Raymond James Financial Services Advisors, Inc.

Raymond James is not affiliated with CNBC.

Widowed Too Soon

Contributed by: Sandra Adams, CFP®

When we hear the term widow or widower, we picture someone older – someone deep into their retirement years. The reality is, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, the average age of a widow or widower in the U.S. is currently 59-years-old. In my recent experience with clients, I have seen the statistics become reality. Clients becoming widowed well before their retirement years has, unfortunately, become increasingly common. The issues involved with this major, and often unexpected, life transition are not simple and are hard to go through alone.

If you are one that is left behind, there are several action steps that should be taken to get back on your feet and feel financially confident. In most cases, this is the woman (according to the U.S. Census Bureau, 32% of women over age 65 are widowed compared to 11% of men). There is no timetable for when these steps should be taken – everyone grieves in their own time and everyone is ready in their own time to move on and make sound financial decisions at different times. No one should be pushed into making financial decisions for their new normal until they are ready.

The first step is identifying sources of income. For young widows or widowers, you may still be working, but may have lost a source of income when your spouse passed away. Looking at where income might come from now and into the future is important. For young widows, life insurance is likely the source of the replacement for lost income. If you are closer to retirement, you may also have Veteran’s benefits, employer pension benefits, savings plans, home equity, income from investments, and Social Security.

The second step is to get your financial plan organized. Get all of your documents and statements put together and review your estate documents (update them, if needed). A big part of this is to update your expenses and budget. This may take some time, as your life without your spouse may not look exactly the same as it did with him/her. Determining what your new normal looks like and what it will cost may take some time to figure out. And it won’t be half the cost (even if you don’t have children), but it won’t be 100% or more either – it will likely be somewhere in between. Figuring out how much it costs you to live goes a long way toward knowing what you will need and how you will make it all work going forward. Your financial planner can be a huge help in this area.

The third step is to evaluate your insurances (health and long-term care). These costs can be significant as you get older, and it is important to make sure you have good coverage. For younger widows, those that are still working may have health insurance from their employer. If not, it is important to make sure you work with an agent to get counseling on the best coverage for you through the exchange until you are eligible for Medicare at age 65. And for long-term care, if you haven’t already worked with a financial planner to plan coverage and are now widowed – now is the time. Single folks are even more likely to need long-term care insurance than those with a partner.

The fourth step is to work on planning your future retirement income. Many widows don’t think enough about planning for their own financial future. What kinds of things should you be talking to your adviser about?

• Income needs going into retirement

• The things you would like to do in retirement/their retirement goals (travel/hobbies, etc.)

• What financial resources you have now (assets, income sources, etc.)

• Risk tolerance

• Charitable goals, family gifting goals, etc.

You can work with the adviser to design a tax-efficient retirement income plan to meet your goals with appropriate tools based on tax considerations and risk tolerances, etc.

And the fifth step is to evaluate housing options. We often tell new widows not to make big decisions, like changing homes, within the first year or two. However, many decide that they want or need to move because the house they are in is too big or they just need to make a move. Housing is roughly 40 – 45% of the average household budget – decisions need to be made with care.

For all widows, going it alone can be difficult with a lot of decisions and time spent alone. For many, it is going through the process of redesigning retirement all over again, now alone, when it was meant to be with your long-time partner. And learning to live a new normal and planning the next phase of life that looks entirely different than the one you had planned. With the help of a professional financial adviser, the financial side of things can be easier – the living part just takes time.

Sandra Adams, CFP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and holds a CeFT™ designation. She specializes in Elder Care Financial Planning and serves as a trusted source for national publications, including The Wall Street Journal, Research Magazine, and Journal of Financial Planning.

Raymond James and its advisers do not offer tax or legal advice. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional. Any opinions are those of Sandra D. Adams and not necessarily those of Raymond James.

Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. Member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Center for Financial Planning, Inc., is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services.

The information contained in this blog has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete, it is not a statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision, and it does not constitute a recommendation. Prior to making an investment decision, please consult with your financial advisor about your individual situation.

How Can I Estimate Retirement Income Needs?

Contributed by: Josh Bitel, CFP®

Planning for retirement is on everyone's mind at some point in their career. But figuring out where to begin to project how much income will be needed can be a tall task. Sure, there are rules of thumb to follow, but cookie-cutter approaches may only work for some. When estimating your retirement needs, here is a quick guide to get you started.

Use Your Current Income as a Starting Point

One popular approach is to use a percentage of your current working income. Industry professionals disagree on what percentage to use; it could be anywhere from 60% to 90% or even more. The appeal of this approach lies in its simplicity and the fact that there is a fairly common-sense analysis underlying it. Your current income sustains your present lifestyle, so taking that income and reducing it by a specific percentage to reflect that there will be certain expenses you will no longer have is a good way to sustain a comfortable retirement.

The problem with this approach is that it does not account for your unique situation. For example, if you intend to travel more in retirement, you might need 100% (or more) of your current income to accomplish your goals. 

Estimate Retirement Expenses

Another challenging piece of the equation is figuring out what your retirement expenses may look like. After all, a plan will only be successful if it accounts for the basic minimum needs. Remember that the cost of living will go up over time. And keep in mind that your retirement expenses may change from year to year. For example, paying off a mortgage would decrease your expenses, while healthcare costs as we age will have the opposite effect on your budget.

Understand How Retirement Age Can Change the Calculation

In a nutshell, the earlier you retire, the more money you will need to rely on to support your lifestyle. I recently wrote a blog simplifying this topic: click here to see more.

Account For Your Life Expectancy

Of course, when you stop working is only one piece of the pie to determine how long of a retirement you will experience. The other, harder to estimate, piece is your life expectancy. It is important to understand that the average life expectancy of your peers can play into the equation. Many factors play into this, such as location, race, income level, etc., so getting a handle on your specific situation is key. There are many tables that can be found online to assist with this; however, I always encourage people to err on the side of caution and assume a longer-than-average life expectancy to reduce the possibility of running out of money.

Identify Your Sources of Retirement Income

So you have an idea of how much you spend to support your lifestyle and how long your retirement may last, next is understanding where the money comes from. A good place to start for most Americans is Social Security. Check out http://www.ssa.gov to see your current benefit estimate. Other fixed income sources may include a pension or annuity. Beyond that, we normally rely on investments such as a 401k plan at work or other retirement plans.

Address Any Income Shortfalls

In a perfect world, we have added up our retirement lifestyle and compared it with our sources of retirement income, and found that we have plenty set aside to support a comfortable retirement. However, this is not always the case. If you have gone through this exercise and come to the conclusion of an income shortfall, here are a few ideas to help bridge that gap:

• Consider delaying your retirement for a few years

• Try to cut current expenses so you will have more money to save for retirement

• Work part-time during retirement for extra income

As always, an advisor can help with this calculation and inspire confidence in your path to financial independence. Reach out to us today if you are thinking about that light at the end of the tunnel!

Josh Bitel, CFP® is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® He conducts financial planning analysis for clients and has a special interest in retirement income analysis.

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of the author and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. Rebalancing a non-retirement account could be a taxable event that may increase your tax liability. Conversions from IRA to Roth may be subject to its own five-year holding period. Unless certain criteria are met, Roth IRA owners must be 59½ or older and have held the IRA for five years before tax-free withdrawals of contributions along with any earnings are permitted. Converting a traditional IRA into a Roth IRA has tax implications. Investors should consult a tax advisor before deciding to do a conversion. Matching contributions from your employer may be subject to a vesting schedule. Please consult with your financial advisor for more information. 401(k) plans are long-term retirement savings vehicles. Withdrawal of pre-tax contributions and/or earnings will be subject to ordinary income tax and, if taken prior to age 59 1/2, may be subject to a 10% federal tax penalty. Contributions to a Roth 401(k) are never tax deductible, but if certain conditions are met, distributions will be completely income tax free. Unlike Roth IRAs, Roth 401(k) participants are subject to required minimum distributions at age 72.

How Much Does It Actually Take to Retire Early?

Contributed by: Josh Bitel, CFP®

Like most people, you have probably thought of the possibility of an early retirement, enjoying your remaining years doing whatever brings you joy and being financially independent. Whether you have your eyes set on traveling, lowering your golf score, spending more time with your family, or any other hobbies to take up your time, you may wonder… How much money does it actually take to retire at age 55?

If you have thought about retirement, you are likely familiar with the famous “4% rule”. This rule of thumb states that if you withdraw 4% of your investment portfolio or less each year, you will more than likely experience a ‘safe’ retirement, sheltered from the ebbs and flows of the stock market as best you can. However, some may not know that this rule assumes a 30-year retirement, which is typical for most retirees. If we want to stretch that number to 40 years, the withdrawal rate is slightly lower. For this blog, we will assume a 3.5% withdrawal rate; some professionals have argued that 3% is the better number, but I will split the difference.

A key component of a retiree’s paycheck is Social Security. The average working family has a household Social Security benefit of just under $3,000/month. For our calculations, we will assume $35,424/year for a married couple retiring at age 65. For a couple retiring ten years sooner, however, this benefit will be reduced to compensate for the lost wages. The 55-year-old couple will collect $27,420/year starting as soon as they are able to collect (age 62).

For simplicity’s sake, we will assume a retirement ‘need’ of $10,000/month in retirement from all sources. A $120,000/year budget is fairly typical for an affluent family in retirement nowadays, especially for those with the means to retire early. Of course, we get to deduct our Social Security benefit from our budget to determine how much is needed from our portfolio to support our lifestyle in retirement. (Note that we are assuming no additional income sources like pensions or annuities for this example). As the 4% (or 3.5%) safe withdrawal rule already accounts for future inflation, we can apply this rule to determine an approximate retirement fund ‘need.’ See the following table for the results:

As you can see, over $500,000 in additional assets would be needed to retire ten years earlier. These rules can be applied to larger or smaller retirement budgets as well. While this exercise was heavily predicated on a rule of thumb, it is worth noting that no rule is perfect. Your experience could differ considerably from the assumptions listed above.

This exercise was your author’s best attempt to simplify an otherwise exceptionally complex life transition. This is merely scratching the surface on what it takes to retire comfortably. To increase your financial plan’s success rate, many other factors must be considered, such as tax treatment of distributions, asset allocation of your investments, life expectancy, etc. If you are interested in fine-tuning your own plan to try to retire earlier, it is best to consult an expert.

Josh Bitel, CFP® is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® He conducts financial planning analysis for clients and has a special interest in retirement income analysis.

The foregoing information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete, it is not a statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision, and it does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of the author and not necessarily those of Raymond James. While we are familiar with the tax provisions of the issues presented herein, as Financial Advisors of RJFS, we are not qualified to render advice on tax or legal matters. You should discuss tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional. Examples used are for illustrative purposes only.

Maximizing your 401k Contributions: Nuances to Save you Money

Contributed by: Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP®

When starting a career, we are always told to contribute at least the minimum needed to get the full company match in our 401k (typically between 4% and 8%, depending on how your plan is structured). “Never throw away free money!” is a phrase we use quite often with children of clients who are starting that first job out of college.

But what about those who are well established in their career and fully maximizing 401k contributions ($22,500 for 2023, $29,000 if you are over the age of 50)? They should not have to worry about not receiving their full employer match, right? Well, depending on how your 401k plan is structured at work, the answer is yes! 

Let me provide an example to explain what I am referring to:
Let’s say Heather (age 54) earns a salary of $325,000 and elects to contribute 18% of her salary to her 401k. Because Heather has elected to contribute a percentage of her salary to her 401k instead of a set dollar figure, she will max out her contributions ($29,000) by the end of June each year. Let us also assume that Heather receives a 5% employer match on her 401k – this translates into $16,250/yr ($325,000 x 5%). If Heather does not have what is known as a “true up” feature within her plan, her employer will stop making matching contributions on her behalf halfway through the year – the point at which she maxed out for the year and contributions stopped. In this hypothetical example, not having the “true up” feature would cost Heather over $8,000 in matching dollars for the year!

So, how can you ensure you receive the matching dollars you are fully entitled to within your 401k? 
The first step I recommend is reaching out to your benefits director or 401k plan provider and asking them if your plan offers the “true up” feature. If it does, you are in the clear – regardless of when you max out for the year with your contributions, you will be receiving the full company match you are entitled to. 

If your plan does not offer the “true up” feature and you plan on maximizing your 401k contributions for the year, I would strongly suggest electing to defer a dollar amount instead of a percentage of your salary. For example, if you are over 50, plan on contributing $29,000 to your 401k this year, and if you are paid bi-weekly, elect to defer $1,115.38 every pay period ($1,115.38 x 26 pay periods = $29,000). Doing so will ensure you maximize your benefit by the end of December and not end up like Heather, who maxes out by the end of June and potentially loses out on significant matching dollars.  

Subtle nuances such as the “true up” 401k feature exist all around us in financial planning, and they can potentially have a large impact on the long-term success of your overall financial game plan. If you have questions on how to best utilize your employer’s 401k or retirement savings vehicle, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us for guidance. 

Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Nick specializes in tax-efficient retirement income and distribution planning for clients and serves as a trusted source for local and national media publications, including WXYZ, PBS, CNBC, MSN Money, Financial Planning Magazine and OnWallStreet.com.

Examples are hypothetical and are not representative of every employer's retirement plan. Not all employers offer matching 401(k) contributions. Please contact your employer's benefits department or retirement plan provider for terms on potential matching contributions.

Any opinions are those of Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services are offered through Raymond James Financial Services Advisors, Inc.

How Doing Your Retirement Planning Can Put You in the Driver’s Seat

Contributed by: Sandra Adams, CFP®

I have had some fascinating conversations in meetings with prospective clients over the last several months. Most of these clients have never previously worked with a financial planner, choosing the DIY (“Do It Yourself”) route until now. And for most, now that they are within a few years of retirement, knowing if they truly have the assets and income resources to be able to retire and support themselves throughout their life expectancies is something they do not want to leave to chance.

Going through the in-depth retirement planning process with the assistance of a financial planning professional can help answer the many questions that so many clients have trouble answering on their own or can only guess without accurate analysis. Things like:

• When should I take Social Security (or when should each of us take Social Security if we are a married couple)?;

• When is the best time to draw pensions and/or should I take the lifetime income benefit (if I choose this option, do I take a straight life payout vs. a payout with a spousal benefit if I am married) vs. the lump sum payout from my pension benefit?;

• If I have an annuity(ies), should I use them for income during retirement, and when?;

• What accounts do I draw from, and when do I draw from them to pay the least amount of taxes during retirement?

• How will I pay for Long Term Care if I do not have Long Term Care insurance?

• And most importantly, will I be able to financially support the lifestyle I desire for as long as I may live without running out of money?

Many potential clients I have met recently have come in assuming they will need to work until they are at least 70 (the age of their maximum Social Security age). While they may value their work, in many cases, it has seemed apparent that there was a fair amount of stress involved with the work they are doing. Knowing whether the client could retire earlier than 70 and giving them the CHOICE about when they could retire would undoubtedly put them in the driver’s seat. Knowledge is power!

Doing your retirement planning earlier than later allows you to make the choices you want to make when you want to make them. Knowing where you stand financially, now and into the future, allows you to decide what you want to do and when you want to do it — you are the driver, and you choose the route to your retirement destination!

Sandra Adams, CFP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and holds a CeFT™ designation. She specializes in Elder Care Financial Planning and serves as a trusted source for national publications, including The Wall Street Journal, Research Magazine, and Journal of Financial Planning.

Opinions expressed in the attached article are those of Sandra D. Adams, CFP® and are not necessarily those of Raymond James. Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. Member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services.

SECURE ACT 2.0 Is FINALLY Happening!

Contributed by: Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CSRIC™

For the last several months, we have been monitoring the possibility of a "Secure Act 2.0" being passed into legislation. The initial SECURE Act (which stands for Setting Every Community Up for Retirement) was passed in late 2019, and had far-reaching effects on Required Minimum Distributions, inherited retirement accounts, and expanded the ability to contribute to IRAs.

Throughout the year, there have been talks about additional legislation through the Secure Act 2.0 to further expand access to retirement savings for individuals, small-business employees, employees with student loans, and part-time workers. 

On Thursday, December 22nd, Secure Act 2.0 was pushed through as part of the $1.7 billion 2023 omnibus appropriations bill (which is a brief 4,000+ page read). Some of the key provisions contained in the bill include:

• Higher retirement plan catch-up limits beginning at age 60 and increasing each year of age. This will likely go into effect in 2024.

• Increasing the Required Minimum Distribution age to 73 in 2023, and eventually it will be increased to age 75 over several years.

• Requiring employers to auto-enroll new employees into their current 401(k) or 403(b) plans with an automatic contribution increase each year.

• The tax penalty for missing a Required Minimum Distribution will be reduced from 50% to 25%, with the future ability to reduce the penalty to 10% if the miss is corrected in a timely manner.

• The establishment of a “starter” 401(k) plan or 403(b) plan for employers that do not currently offer retirement plans.

• A 100% tax credit for employer matches in newly established employer retirement plans.

• Allowing student loan repayments to be treated as retirement plan contributions for company match purposes.

• Establishment of a retirement savings Lost and Found for those who have lost track of old retirement plans.

• A pension linked emergency savings provision.  These accounts must be held in cash and contributions (up to a maximum balance of $2,500) must be treated as retirement plan contributions for matching purposes. Distributions would be tax free.

• Emergency withdrawals up to $1,000 every 3 years, or until the previous withdrawal has been paid back, will be allowed from retirement plans.

• Part-time employees with 2 years of 500+ hours will qualify for retirement plan participation

• The ability to transfer some 529 funds to a Roth IRA in the 529 beneficiary’s name. The amount that can be transferred is subject to Roth IRA annual contribution limits with the lifetime transfer amount of $35,000. Roth IRA contribution income limits do not apply.  The 529 needs to have been established for 15 years.

Many of these updates will slowly go into effect over time, and we are continuing to actively monitor and research Secure Act 2.0 as details continue to emerge. We will provide additional information as it is available, but if you have any questions about how this could affect you, please contact your Financial Planner. We are always happy to help!

Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CSRIC™ is a Financial Planning Manager and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She has more than a decade of financial planning and insurance industry experience.

The information contained in this letter does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CSRIC™, and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expression of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statement, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected, including diversification and asset allocation. Individual investor’s results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Rebalancing a non-retirement account could be a taxable event that may increase your tax liability.