Second Quarter Investment Commentary 2020

Contributed by: Angela Palacios, CFP®, AIF®

As the economy slowly opened and our grocery store shelves were restocked, the second quarter became one of the best in decades.  Tailwinds such as government stimulus, positive trends in “flatting the curve”, economic reopening, good news on virus treatment, and hope of a vaccine gave investors the confidence they needed to flock back into stocks.  This comes in stark contrast to the first quarter with a dizzying correction for the S&P 500 down 34% in about one month.

Many are left wondering if this is too good to be true and there are several different and all very valid view points on this matter. 

How can equities be back to near-peak levels when we are still in a pandemic?

As indexes recovered much of what they lost in the first quarter, some investors are left scratching their heads wondering how this could be when businesses lost out on so much during the shutdown of the economy.  At first glance, this does seem to be strange.  There are several possible reasons this has occurred.

1. The hardest hit companies were small businesses not reflected in large indexes like the S&P 500.  When people couldn’t frequent their local small businesses for the goods they needed during the shutdown they turned to online shopping from big box places in droves.  So, what small businesses have lost, large businesses have gained (at least in the short term).

2. Government provided assistance in the form of forgivable debt to small businesses and issuing checks directly to individuals.  So, not only, were people stuck at home with nowhere to spend their income (other than fixed bills), but they were also given stimulus checks.  For many, this provided a much needed back stop to pay important bills like a mortgage or car payment.  However, the data also shows that much of this has been put away for a rainy day.  Check out the historical chart below of the M1 Money Stock (the amount of money held by individuals that is ready to spend. ie. currency and checking account deposits in the US).  We have never seen a spike of this magnitude.

As businesses have reopened, many goods and services are in high demand like automobiles and home improvement.  People are now spending the money they couldn’t spend while stuck at home and the market is pricing this into results that should be reflected in the next quarter’s earnings reports.

3. Lower interest rates mean home owners can refinance debt at lower interest rates, putting more money in their pockets and less in the bank’s pockets.  People can also buy new cars with 0% financing.  Lower interest rates also leave those seeking income on investments with very few places to turn other than equities to replace the loss in income.

What could cause the markets to head right back down?

I have this feeling that the economy is balancing on the edge of a knife right now.  The momentum is forward toward recovery but several risks could slow or undermine that momentum:

• A resurgence of the virus – COVID-19 alone isn’t the cause of a potential market pull back, but this does increase the probabilities of parts of the economy having to close for periods.  A good case in point is the recent closure of indoor bar service in parts of Michigan after several bar gatherings have been identified as sources of local spikes in cases.  I don’t think we will see widespread shut down of economies again but there will be pockets of this occurring.

• Expiration of supplemental unemployment benefits – If people are unable to go back to their jobs, or find new ones, the loss of the extra unemployment income at the end of July could be a significant hit to consumer confidence.  This means that the e-spending habits that are currently boosting the economy, could go away very quickly.  I view this as the largest risk to the recovery right now because unemployment is at 11.1% nationally with Michigan being one of the hardest-hit states for job loss.  As shown by the chart below, we have not experienced such widespread job loss in a recession in recent history.  The jobs data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for June shows that we are adding a large number of jobs back so, for right now, we appear to be improving on this front.

• Governments failing to provide more stimulus if needed – How politics play out is always an unknown that cannot be predicted but if shutdowns become more widespread again, people will look to the government for more assistance.  If this isn’t provided we could see a swift correction.  I believe, if needed, we will see more stimulus in the future as the government has proven with it’s actions that it does stand ready to support the economy.

• How many small business will survive?  This is a question that only time will tell but the risk is high that many will not.  They represent a large employer in the economy so major closures will have a highly negative impact on employment numbers.

What are we doing in response?

The Investment Committee is discussing topics like “How to invest through periods of low to negative interest rates?” and “How do we best help clients achieve their financial goals when deficits and current valuations could be a long term anchor to portfolio returns?”  Our Jaclyn Jackson, CAP® recently wrote the blog How To Invest In Turbulent Markets where she articulates what we can control, representing a great summary of what we do behind the scenes for our clients. 

Not long ago the markets and the economy seemed to be in freefall, but we just had one of the best quarters ever for market returns.  It is important to remember that investors look at whether things are getting better or worse; this is a large driver of markets.  At the end of the first quarter, things were getting worse and investors had no idea where a bottom could be or how long we would be shut down.  Since then, much has improved, we have more knowledge on this virus and the economy continues to improve which explains why the markets are up (even though the magnitude may not make intuitive sense).  These vast swings in sentiment have created many opportunities for changes in portfolios.  If you ever have questions regarding the addressed topics and how it relates to your portfolio, please don’t hesitate to reach out to discuss.  We are here for you and thank you for your continued trust.

Angela Palacios, CFP®, AIF®

Partner & Director of Investments

Angela Palacios, CFP®, AIF®, is a partner and Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She chairs The Center Investment Committee and pens a quarterly Investment Commentary.

---

Opinions are those of the author and not necessarily those of Raymond James. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Past performance doesn't guarantee future results. Investing involves risk regardless of the strategy selected The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that's generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. You cannot invest directly in any index.

Think Portfolio Diversification is Overrated – Read This

Contributed by: Jaclyn Jackson

Let’s face it, the S&P 500 has consistently beat diversified portfolios since 2009.  Demonstrated below, a diversified portfolio of bonds, domestic stocks, and international stocks (crimson bar) was edged out by the S&P 500 nine of the last ten years. With the S&P’s winning streak, why would investors consider putting money to work anywhere else but US equities?

What The Fund?

For decades, investment professionals have preached the merits of portfolio diversification and asset allocation, but lately, performance hasn’t supported their conviction.  So why are investment professionals adamant about diversification? It began in 1952 when Harry Markowitz (a graduate student who became a

Nobel Prize winning economist) published an article in the Journal of Finance where he outlined the premise of his popularized Modern Portfolio Theory.  Essentially, the theory highlights the relationship between risk and reward for different types of investments. It then mathematically assesses investors’ ability to take on risks with performance expectations to create an optimal portfolio.  In other words, Markowitz laid the groundwork to help investors discover the right combination of investment products to achieve a certain level of performance without taking unnecessary risks.  

A Case for Portfolio Diversification

If you were looking to maximize portfolio growth over the last decade, you could have easily been tempted to scrap diversification in favor of the S&P 500.  Yet, there is evidence that Markowitz’s theory is still relevant for today’s investors. Craig L. Israelsen, PhD and Executive-in-Residence in the Personal Financial Planning Program at Utah Valley University, did compelling research around portfolio diversification worth reviewing. He compared five portfolios that represent different risks levels and asset allocations over 50-years, from 1970-2019.  While there is much to glean from his research, I’d like to zoom in on his comparison of two moderately aggressive portfolios because it shows the value of portfolio diversification. 

The first Moderately Aggressive Portfolio has a traditional 60% US Stock, 40% Bond asset allocation. The second Moderately Aggressive Portfolio has a 14.3% allocation to seven different asset classes.  In 2019, a year dominated by the S&P 500, the first portfolio (having a larger composition of the S&P 500) predictably outperformed the second portfolio.  On the other hand, over the 50-year period the second portfolio had similar annualized gross return with a lower standard deviation.  An investor in the second, 7-Asset Diversified Portfolio, had similar returns without taking as much risk as an investor in the first portfolio.  

There is another point worth spotlighting here.  Imagine if you only invested in the S&P 500, as represented by the Very Aggressive 100% US Stock portfolio, over that 50-year period. Compared with the 7-Asset Diversified Portfolio, the 100% US Stock portfolio had a 7% greater standard deviation for just under a percent greater return.  The diversified portfolio would have given you most of the return for half the headache.

Complex Portfolios for Complex Living

Investors don’t invest in a bubble or just for kicks.  In reality, investors use portfolios to serve needs and meet financial goals. Digging deeper into Israelsen’s research, he explores a real-life need and a common portfolio use: supplementing retirement.  His research evaluates a $250,000 initial investment for each portfolio over 26 rolling 25-year periods from 1970-2019 and assumes a 5% initial end-of-year withdrawal with 3% annual cost of living adjustment taken at the end of each year.

Again, looking at the two Moderately Aggressive Portfolios, the 60% US Stock, 40% Bond Portfolio had a median ending balance of $1,234,749 after 25 years compared to the 7-Asset Diversified Portfolio median ending balance of $1,806,565.  Likewise, if someone had aggressively invested in US Stock over that time, (s)he would still end up with less money than the diversified portfolio at $1,500.554.  This best illustrates why Modern Portfolio Theory (limiting risk through diversification) still matters.  Retirees want to avoid choppy investment experiences as they pull money from their accounts and create even returns through diversification that extend the longevity of their portfolios.

Pulling it all together, life is complex and investors use their investment portfolios to manage those complexities.  Investor needs and financial goals punctuate the necessity of investing in ways that diminish excessive risk-taking and extend the life of portfolios. Everything considered, risks mitigation through portfolio diversification stands true today, even for investors who’ve witnessed an S&P 500 tear over the last decade. 

Jaclyn Jackson is a Portfolio Administrator at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She manages client portfolios and performs investment research.

---

The foregoing information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete, it is not a statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision, and it does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of the author, and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected, including diversification and asset allocation. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary.

The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Standard deviation measures the fluctuation of returns around the arithmetic average return of investment. The higher the standard deviation, the greater the variability (and thus risk) of the investment returns.

Performance of hypothetical investments do not reflect transaction costs, taxes, or returns that any investor actually attained and may not reflect the true costs, including management fees, of an actual portfolio. Changes in any assumption may have a material impact on the hypothetical returns presented. Illustrations does not include fees and expenses which would reduce returns.

Market Performance and Viral Outbreaks

Contributed by: Angela Palacios, CFP®, AIF®

Recent market volatility caused by the spread of the coronavirus and a fear of a global economic slowdown has left many wondering if this has happened before and if so, is it different this time?  There have been numerous outbreaks in recent history that we can look at.  Below is a list of different outbreaks (many of which were far deadlier than the coronavirus) that occurred. Check out the return of the S&P 500 6 and 12 months after the epidemic.

But how about a short term global impact?  The chart below shows 1 month, 3 month, and 6 month returns of the MSCI World index.  Again, not the extreme reaction that we are feeling right now in markets. 

While there may have been short term volatility, in most cases it was short lived.

But you may still be thinking that it is different this time.   The world is far more dependent on global trade than it was during SARS in 2003 for example.  There will be some supply chain disruptions and we may not be able to source these goods from other locations quickly enough.  For example, Coca-Cola recently announced that there may be some supply disruptions in the artificial sweetener used in Diet Coke and Zero Sugar Coke…this could be devastating!  I may have to switch to drinking regular coke! Actually, I don’t drink very much pop but now that I know there could be a shortage I’m craving it!  Jokes aside, many industries may face this challenge until China is back up and running around the globe.  The trade war has actually done more to prepare us for this situation than, I think, anything could have.  Companies were already searching for supply sources outside of China or bringing production back into the U.S. after the implementation of tariffs last year.

The severity of the virus will dictate the eventual outcome. Right now investors are taking a “sell first and ask questions later” mentality. We have a lot to learn from the individuals in the U.S. under care of physicians here in the U.S. as to exactly how deadly this flu is under our system of healthcare which is one of the best in the world. Markets are selling off on a guess, right now, of where this could head. If history is any indicator, by this time next year, this should be a distant memory.

Angela Palacios, CFP®, AIF®, is a partner and Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She chairs The Center Investment Committee and pens a quarterly Investment Commentary.

---

There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Past Performance does not guarantee future results. One cannot invest directly in an index. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The MSCI World is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure large and mid cap performance across 23 developed markets countries. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete.

Markets Flash Fear as COVID-19 Approaches Pandemic Status

Contributed by: Raymond James

U.S. equity indices fell over 3% on continued news of the coronavirus’ spread.

As coronavirus cases continue to escalate in several new regions, like South Korea, Italy, Japan, Iran, Singapore and the United States, Raymond James Healthcare Policy Analyst Chris Meekins believes we are now in the midst of a COVID-19 pandemic. The word itself isn’t intended to cause panic, but rather to prompt increased awareness of the potential economic and health effects of this rapidly spreading virus. Meekins believes the United States now faces a 1 in 3 chance of a widespread outbreak given recent events.

Unfortunately, the illness – thought to have originated in Wuhan, an important Chinese manufacturing hub – has taken its toll on equity markets, causing disruption in several industries, including travel and energy, as well as major supply chains in India and China. Amid the trade war, supply chains generally migrated away from China to places like Vietnam, Thailand and Mexico; however, global supply chains are deep and complex, and disruptions have already led to halts in motor vehicle production in Japan and South Korea, explains Chief Economist Scott Brown. U.S. firms also face a loss of sales to the Chinese market, he notes.

In addition, oil fell on concerns over weakened Chinese demand and the risk of further demand impact outside the Asia-Pacific region. However, Raymond James energy equity research analyst Pavel Molchanov believes oil prices should recover by year’s end, overcoming the virus-related demand headwinds. The current production outage in Libya is also helping to “cancel out” some of the demand headwinds.

While volatility is likely to continue to weigh on certain sectors until the virus is contained, any pullback could be viewed as a potential buying opportunity within favored sectors as the overall fundamental backdrop remains supportive of equities, according to Chief Investment Officer Larry Adam. Opportunities to add fundamentally sound positions to your portfolio may present themselves over the near term. Your advisor will continue to monitor the news for indications of broader impacts and share any developments with you.

It’s hoped that the global response to contain the deadly respiratory disease proves effective soon and that increased public awareness will deter the spread of the virus. To learn more about how to protect yourself and your family, please visit cdc.gov for updates.

Investing involves risk, and investors may incur a profit or a loss. Sector investments are companies engaged in business related to a specific sector. They are subject to fierce competition and their products and services may be subject to rapid obsolescence. There are additional risks associated with investing in an individual sector, including limited diversification. Investing in oil involves special risks, including the potential adverse effects of state and federal regulation, and may not be suitable for all investors. All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the Research Department of Raymond James & Associates, Inc., and are subject to change. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. This material is being provided for information purposes only. Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation.